Tags Projects About License

Comparing Dgraph and Neo4j Graph Databases: Key Differences and Use Cases

Comparing Dgraph and Neo4j Graph Databases: Key Differences and Use Cases

In the world of modern data engineering, graph databases have gained significant prominence for their ability to efficiently store, query, and traverse interconnected data. When it comes to selecting the perfect graph database for your project, two names often come up: Dgraph and Neo4j. Each has its unique set of strengths and weaknesses, and in this blog post, we're diving deep into the features, pros, and cons of both to help you make an informed decision for your project.


Dgraph is a native graph database. Dgraph is a relative newcomer, hitting the graph database scene in late 2017 with its version 1.0. It uses the Dgraph Query Language (DQL), a modification of the GraphQL spec by Facebook, tailored for graph databases. DQL combines the versatility of GraphQL with the robust capabilities of graph traversals, enabling complex filtering, sorting, and pagination options.

While Dgraph is a commercial product, it also offers an open-source license without additional restrictions. This open approach provides flexibility to organizations considering its adoption.

Dgraph excels in managing multi-dimensional data relationships, making it a standout choice for industries such as finance, healthcare, social networking, and e-commerce — where intricate relationships are the norm.


Dgraph operates as a cluster of server nodes, including Dgraph Zero for metadata management and Dgraph Alpha for storing data and indices. This distributed design ensures scalability and data security. Plus, with built-in distributed backup and recovery, your data's safety and availability are guaranteed.

Dgraph Architecture


What truly sets Dgraph apart is its remarkable performance, characterized by astonishingly fast response times, even for the most complex queries. Dgraph achieves this through a custom-built storage engine optimized for graph data. It utilizes a unique approach known as predicate sharding, that allows parallel execution for complex queries.

Dgraph provides a schema-less design, allowing engineers to make rapid changes to the data model. It supports typed predicates, it allows to specify the types of data that can be stored in certain fields. This feature ensures strong data typing and validation during data ingestion.


Dgraph provides essential tools to define schemas, load data, and query the database:

  • Ratel: Ratel is a user-friendly GUI application from Dgraph that executes DQL queries and mutations. It also offers schema viewing and editing capabilities, along with some cluster management operations.

  • Dgraph Lambdas: Dgraph Lambdas are JavaScript-based data functions that can enhance query results. They serve as database triggers and custom GraphQL resolvers, running within an optional node.js server included in any cloud deployment.


Neo4j is a well-established player in the graph database world. It is an open-source, native graph database that provides high-performance graph processing capabilities.

Neo4j supports the Cypher query language, an expressive query language which is similar to SQL, but is optimized for working with graph data — it simplifies the expression of graph patterns and relationships in queries. This makes it easy for engineers, data analysts and data scientists to analyze and visualize data, without needing to have extensive knowledge of database management.


Neo4j's architecture is purpose-built for efficient graph database management. It operates within a clustered environment comprising Primary and Secondary server nodes. Primary nodes handle transaction processing and data integrity using the Raft protocol for replication, enhancing fault tolerance. Secondary nodes scale read queries and serve as caches, enabling efficient handling of large-scale graph queries.

This architecture prioritizes high availability and operational simplicity, streamlining tasks like scaling and resource allocation while ensuring robust performance and seamless data views through Neo4j's causal consistency model.

Neo4j uses a property graph model with an index-based storage engine designed to handle high-performance graph traversals.

Neo4j has rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions that allow you to extend its functionality for specific use cases. These include integrations with popular programming languages and frameworks, as well as third party tools for data visualization and analysis.


Neo4j equips engineers with a range of tools for defining schemas, loading data, and querying the database:

  • Neo4j Desktop: A user-friendly interface for managing Neo4j databases, installing plugins, and developing applications with Neo4j.

  • Cypher Query Language: A SQL-like declarative language tailored for querying and modifying graph data within Neo4j.

  • Plugins and Libraries: Neo4j offers various plugins and libraries, with one standout example being APOC (Awesome Procedures on Cypher). APOC serves as a library of user-defined procedures and functions, facilitating tasks like data import, export, and transformation within the Neo4j environment.

Dgraph vs Neo4j: Side to Side

Ease of Use: Dgraph isn't the easiest system to use. It'll take some effort to get used to it query language and data model. Neo4j, on the other hand, keeps things simple with its intuitive (kinda) Cypher language and user-friendly tools.

Performance: When comparing performance metrics between Dgraph and Neo4j, Dgraph tends to excel in scenarios that require handling massive graph datasets with high read and write throughput. Neo4j, with its focus on expressive querying and ease of use, may shine in smaller-scale use cases where complex graph traversals are not the primary concern.

Scalability: Dgraph is built from the ground up with scalability in mind. It offers horizontal scalability by distributing data across multiple nodes, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. Neo4j also supports horizontal scalability but requires additional configuration and setup to achieve distributed deployments.

Algorithms: Neo4j has a massive library of built-in algorithms for graph analysis, making it a top pick. Dgraph, however, is a bit modest in this department. It might need you to build your own algorithms or rely on third-party libraries, even though it's good with complex join operations and aggregations.

ACID compliance and transaction support: Both Dgraph and Neo4j are ACID compliant and provide transaction support. Dgraph's transactions are distributed by design, enabling consistency across multiple nodes. Neo4j offers explicit transaction management, allowing fine-grained control over commit and rollback operations.

Schema design considerations: Dgraph offers a flexible schema-less design, allowing engineers to iterate quickly on the data model. It supports typed predicates, which enable strong typing and validation of data during insertion. Neo4j follows a property graph model where nodes and relationships can have properties. It supports explicit schema definition through constraints and indexes, allowing for data validation and query optimization.

Third-party integrations and tooling: Both Dgraph and Neo4j offer integrations and tooling to enhance the development experience. Dgraph provides official client libraries for various programming languages, including Go, JavaScript, Java and Python, allowing engineers to seamlessly integrate Dgraph with their existing applications. Neo4j also offers a range of client libraries and drivers for popular programming languages, enabling easy integration with different tech stacks. Additionally, both databases have integrations with common data visualization tools, making it convenient for engineers to visualize and analyze graph data.

Support: Both Dgraph and Neo4j have active open-source communities and receive contributions from engineers worldwide. Dgraph's community has grown rapidly in recent years, with enthusiastic engineers contributing code, bug reports, and feature requests. Similarly, Neo4j has a strong community that actively contributes to the Neo4j graph ecosystem. These communities provide valuable support and resources for users and help drive the evolution of the respective databases.

Documentation and learning resources: Both Dgraph and Neo4j strive to provide comprehensive and user-friendly materials. Dgraph offers detailed documentation, tutorials, and examples on its website, making it easy for engineers to get up to speed with the database. Neo4j also provides extensive documentation, along with online training courses, webinars, and a vibrant community forum to aid engineers in learning and exploring the capabilities of Neo4j.

The Final Word

Dgraph is a strong choice for teams looking for a cost-effective, efficient solution for complex data relationships, especially in newer, resource-conscious environments. Dgraph excels in its distributed architecture and scalability, making it a great choice for large-scale applications. If you're building a general-purpose knowledge graph and you're low on staff and don't have a laser focus on generalized knowledge, the scale and administrative overhead of Neo4j might be overkill.

Neo4j, on the other hand, provides a wealth of features and a mature ecosystem, making it highly suitable for diverse use cases. Neo4j is better suited for large enterprises or projects requiring extensive community support, a rich set of built-in algorithms, and a user-friendly environment.

In conclusion, both Dgraph and Neo4j offer powerful graph database solutions with unique strengths and capabilities. Choosing between Dgraph and Neo4j depends on your specific requirements. Both are competent solutions, but their strengths cater to different needs and scenarios.


Previous post
Buy me a coffee

More? Well, there you go:

Exploring the Power of Graph Databases

Data Challenges in Big Data

Schema-on-Read vs Schema-on-Write